|
The
Leadership Inquiry Series
A
Case Study by Mike Bell
Background
The Leadership Inquiry was born out of my experiences of working
with many managers who want to do an excellent job but are feeling
increasingly isolated; with few opportunities to talk about the
issues they really face in their work and to learn from one another.
Many of the current challenges faced by managers
relate to leadership and the ‘soft skills’. In times
of change and uncertainty, a trusted forum for exchange, learning
and practice can be a valuable resource both for the managers
and for their organisation.
The case study reports on the experiences of a
group of managers during a pilot phase of the Leadership Inquiry.
Introduction
A large public sector organisation piloted the Leadership Inquiry
with middle and senior managers from across the organisation.
The Leadership Inquiry was set up as a ‘joint
venture’ with the internal training department and the following
is part of an invitation that was emailed to 50 managers together
with a more detailed brochure:
| |
As part of our ongoing mission to offer a wide range of
high quality approaches to personal development, we have
partnered with Mike Bell of The Wisdom Meme Ltd to bring
you an innovative way to improve your leadership capability
- The Leadership Inquiry Series.
The Leadership Inquiry is not a discussion, debate or
presentation but rather a dialogue designed to enable
you, as a member
of a trusted network, to explore the real issues you
face as leaders in a changing organisation. It will
create new
insights, strategies and actions based upon relevant
leadership models, frameworks and research and the
collective wisdom
of the group.
|
|
As a result, we recruited the 16 managers we
wanted for the pilot and a few others were disappointed. The
training department felt this was an excellent response and
even attracted some managers who had otherwise been reluctant
to participate in ‘training courses’.
As each manager signed up for the series they were personally
contacted by me, welcomed and asked to identify two or three
of their key leadership challenges. These were analysed and
grouped into three main themes. The themes and some of
the specific challenges
are listed below:
| |
1. Visionary Leadership
- Developing a strategic vision
- Engaging colleagues with the vision - the troops rather
than, say, the Board
- Leading,
being visionary, and carrying out the work and managing
- are they compatible?
- What leaders have that managers don't
2. Self
- Being
heard and taken seriously without being over- assertive
- Being more assertive in setting goals for others to help achieve
- A reluctance to be confrontational
- All those things around the theme of letting go
- negative criticism of me, etc
- Reconciling what I do and how I appear
to others with how I feel inside
- Being more approachable
- Setting clear objectives for myself and
others
3. Others
- Harnessing
the skills of the senior motivated members of the
organisation
- Change management
- Communication/Effective communication.
- Leading with one or two disruptive people/ Dealing
with difficult employees
- Getting
the team to understand its new role in the changing organisation
|
|
The complete list of challenges was discussed
at the first Inquiry and agreement reached to begin with an exploration
of visionary leadership.
Review
of the 3 Leadership Inquiries
Leadership Inquiry One – Visionary Leadership
The organisation had recently created and published a vision statement
and this was a good opportunity to explore in the large group
what vision meant and what it might mean to be a visionary leader.
Armed with a short article, participants met in small groups to
explore what being a visionary leader meant to them. Their findings
were then discussed in the whole group.
At the end of the Inquiry, members were asked for feedback by
completing the statement ‘As a result of this session ….’
and here are some of their responses:
| |
“I
have been able to reflect and consider qualities that make
for developing a vision for an organisation and the environment
required for leading with such a vision: in part the need
for leading with an inspirational positive view of where
we are going.”
“ I will have to consider if my values are transparent
to my Division. (and do they map onto the organisations
values)”
“I
have learnt that other colleagues have similar issues, problems
and concerns on leadership that I do. Interestingly Core
Values came out as a key driver.”
“ I will further consider my own core values and evaluate
my performance as a ‘visionary leader’ (or not…)”
“ I have a clearer sense of why I feel dissatisfaction
with certain aspects of the organisation’s management.
I feel encouraged by the unanimity in the group about core
values. I feel empowered to follow my beliefs.”
“ I have clarified some perspectives on the needs
for leadership and management within my department and higher
level. I will seek to revive some elements of governance
structures to address issues surrounding core values and
empowerment of staff.”
“I
have shared the sense of the importance of values with colleagues,
developing solidarity. I have developed a clear sense of
some of the deficiencies that arise in the organisation
as consequence of the absence of explicit values.” |
|
Leadership Inquiry
Two – Values
The issue of values came so strongly to the fore in the previous
Inquiry that we agreed to focus on this topic at this session.
Again we had a large group inquiry into values – what they
were, where they were present or not in the organisation and the
value of values.
Then in small groups, and with examples of value statements from
similar organisations, members identified the personal and organisational
values that they felt were needed, and reported these back to
the whole group.
In response to the question ‘As a result of this session
…..’ people said:
| |
“Think
even more about how to ‘reward’ behaviour which
demonstrates values in action.”
“I arrived
quite late but don’t think I have gained much. I was
pleased to be reminded of the importance of looking first
at oneself in any situation”
“I have
a great despair about the ability of others to lead! There
was too much of the personal and not enough about how to
make others and an organisation work”
“I will
use the issues raised and much of the information discussed
as part of my efforts to develop core values for the Department”
“I will
name the values I want my Department to have and discuss
these with a view to rollout/adoption”
“I shall
discuss with my Executive Board about identifying core values
for my department”
“Learned more about the perceptions/experience of
senior staff within the organisation. Still not sure that
all of the behaviour/culture I experience in this new job
is as bad as is described by members”
“It focussed
my views around the issue of values which was incredibly
timely given work on office mission and objectives.”
“I will
re-evaluate my core values and think about how they align
with the actions of myself and my Division”
|
|
Leadership Inquiry Three –
Communication
Distilling the original challenges under the themes of Self and
Others, this session looked into the question ‘Are you sometimes
too aggressive or not assertive enough?’
In the large group we explored examples from people’s work
of aggression and non-assertiveness and then discussed an Assertive/Responsive
model as a way to make sense of some behaviours.
In small groups people explored the model further in relation
to specific work examples and their own behaviour.
In response to the question ‘As a result of this session
…..’ people said:
| |
“I
will think and practice different ways more about how I interact
with people; I think I am rarely assertive, but often aggressive
and non-assertive in almost equal measure and on different
occasions. I know this but I don’t seem to change my
behaviour that much anyway.”
“I will endeavour to spend more time
trying to change the non-assertive character of some of
my colleagues”
“I will review my previous ‘assertiveness’
training and techniques. I will also try to figure out why
some staff behave the way they do”
“I will think more about how I can
influence interactions and will reflect on the Assertive/Responsive
Model”
“I will work in Assertive to move
my team members in Non-Assertive as a priority rather than
allowing this to affect the team. Thank you for today’s
session it has been helpful.”
“I shall discuss with my Executive
Board about identifying core values for my department”
“I will review my own approach to
communications with staff who work for me and with whom
I sometimes have difficulties. And look at ‘listening’
more than talking and resisting the urge to jump in.”
“I have reflected on communication
and benefited from others views”
“I have been able to identify and
verbalise some of the processes involved in communication
between individuals.”
“I’ll carry the suggested model with me to meetings
in the future – very helpful. Also gives me the ability
to reflect on my behaviour/ approaches in relation to outcomes.”
|
|
Recommendations
Participants where asked if they would recommend the Leadership
Inquiry to their colleagues in the organisation. All would be
happy to except one who felt the format might be too ‘risky’.
Here are some of the reasons why they would recommend:
| |
“This
is a forum to hear the ideas of others. It can highlight common
thought but it can also point to areas of difficulty”
“Good opportunity to explore key issues
with colleagues from across the institution. A valuable
forum to provide framework for self-evaluation”
“The opportunity to take time out
to reflect on your own stances/values/ life experiences
and apply to work context experience”
“Thought provoking, examining important
issues, chance to spend time discussing these with colleagues
in a structured way”
“It is a valuable forum for stimulating
thought and insight”
“A forum to discuss important questions
that are otherwise not addressed within the Organisation”
“It makes you think ‘out of
the box’. Gives a better insight into the thoughts
of colleagues in different part of the organisation”
|
|
Review
In the busy-ness of today’s organisations, managers rarely
have the opportunity to look deeply into the issues they face
and make sense (or not!) of what is happening to and around them
The Leadership
Inquiry helps reduce some of the isolation managers feel as they
see that others have similar feelings. It helps them to explore
together, through substantive and purposeful dialogue, the compelling
issues they face, and to learn new approaches they choose to take
away and try out themselves.
In this example,
the client was impressed by participants' claims of what they
will do as a result of the Inquiry. While we did not follow these
up, we have anecdotal evidence that many where being actioned.
We also learned that the Leadership Inquiry is not for everyone
- some people prefer a much more structured approach.
If you see
that organisations are, in part, social structures, then the Leadership
Inquiry adds some glue to build a stronger community and increase
social capital. If you accept that, in a knowledge economy, those
organisations that can create and share new knowledge the fastest
are most likely to succeed, then the Leadership Inquiry elevates
the quality of conversation about key leadership issues, and generates
more knowledge capital.
Mike Bell,
February 2004
©
The Wisdom Meme 2008
|